Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-10 13:24:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 67BCDEB402BAD2CB4B717890D9FF1DA2806DD849B8AC4F08E8372D82B02F3826
Participant Details

Original Note:

Unless and until actual verifiable receipts are shown - It’s conjecture. No one should believe this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1700663029333901707
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 67BCDEB402BAD2CB4B717890D9FF1DA2806DD849B8AC4F08E8372D82B02F3826
  • createdAtMillis - 1694352244210
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 170066302933390170767BCDEB402BAD2CB4B717890D9FF1DA2806DD849B8AC4F08E8372D82B02F3826