Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-08 14:59:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9D672D288CD9251E05F2D6E9E86F0AAF06E4E13E5DFC45E2A6B957AC692D5B45
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Nothing of issue in the post, nothing on this post that is misleading. If other note writers wish the challenge other elements of the article published in the guardian, CN are not the place for that.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1700035930319409237
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9D672D288CD9251E05F2D6E9E86F0AAF06E4E13E5DFC45E2A6B957AC692D5B45
  • createdAtMillis - 1694185178841
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17000359303194092379D672D288CD9251E05F2D6E9E86F0AAF06E4E13E5DFC45E2A6B957AC692D5B45