Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-08 10:03:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66B0E631E4A39B15148B3792366E67D797A5EE7AFAA039E4FCD99C58620588B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Nothing of issue in the post, nothing on this post that is misleading. If other note writers wish the challenge other elements of the article published in the guardian, CN are not the place for that.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1700035930319409237
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 66B0E631E4A39B15148B3792366E67D797A5EE7AFAA039E4FCD99C58620588B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1694167407849
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 170003593031940923766B0E631E4A39B15148B3792366E67D797A5EE7AFAA039E4FCD99C58620588B4