Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-24 09:49:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FBE2E6C9F0F22A96E1D9D53F2020BAC34A96A9FE5FD6FD1D89AC8247CC02186
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Nothing of issue in the post, nothing on this post that is misleading. If other note writers wish the challenge other elements of the article published in the guardian, CN are not the place for that.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1700035930319409237
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FBE2E6C9F0F22A96E1D9D53F2020BAC34A96A9FE5FD6FD1D89AC8247CC02186
  • createdAtMillis - 1716544140382
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17000359303194092374FBE2E6C9F0F22A96E1D9D53F2020BAC34A96A9FE5FD6FD1D89AC8247CC02186