Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-08 17:07:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E481E346BF0EC9B5AC01B43DBAA32FEAF7765E856D9CF1A5A54EF561603B223C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim is factual and the CN fails to mention that Mr. Macklem advised that his statement only applied to the direct costs on energy; he did not factor in the indirect costs of the carbon tax, which is what Mr. Poilievre has been highlighting.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699954880272572748
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E481E346BF0EC9B5AC01B43DBAA32FEAF7765E856D9CF1A5A54EF561603B223C
  • createdAtMillis - 1694192867355
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1699954880272572748E481E346BF0EC9B5AC01B43DBAA32FEAF7765E856D9CF1A5A54EF561603B223C