Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-10 15:25:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C48FEE34F92B98D8D6F79F2C0CAFFADA981F75FEA34D1A56AC1A570315D9D3EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim is factual and the CN fails to mention that Mr. Macklem advised that his statement only applied to the direct costs on energy; he did not factor in the indirect costs of the carbon tax, which is what Mr. Poilievre has been highlighting.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699954880272572748
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C48FEE34F92B98D8D6F79F2C0CAFFADA981F75FEA34D1A56AC1A570315D9D3EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1694359529261
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1699954880272572748C48FEE34F92B98D8D6F79F2C0CAFFADA981F75FEA34D1A56AC1A570315D9D3EF