Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-08 22:14:54 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3C0467CBF355CAB8F29E8E6BB68CCE17A5577BD5C96BE9D087D3400D2CF3B9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim is factual and the CN fails to mention that Mr. Macklem advised that his statement only applied to the direct costs on energy; he did not factor in the indirect costs of the carbon tax, which is what Mr. Poilievre has been highlighting.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699954880272572748
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3C0467CBF355CAB8F29E8E6BB68CCE17A5577BD5C96BE9D087D3400D2CF3B9B
  • createdAtMillis - 1694211294074
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1699954880272572748C3C0467CBF355CAB8F29E8E6BB68CCE17A5577BD5C96BE9D087D3400D2CF3B9B