Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-07 06:04:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A60D0D239F5DF02EEA1023A0E9F0C9266B93A1B7F16147AC28E9FC6CB2088DAA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. The judge denied a motion for dismissal; the case itself to determine signature matching has yet to start. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023-9-1-under-advisement-ruling-and-order-.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699654203759603975
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A60D0D239F5DF02EEA1023A0E9F0C9266B93A1B7F16147AC28E9FC6CB2088DAA
  • createdAtMillis - 1694066641973
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1699654203759603975A60D0D239F5DF02EEA1023A0E9F0C9266B93A1B7F16147AC28E9FC6CB2088DAA