Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-07 07:37:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7B54E082856202DBF8CED4E7CA07BDD7CB5668F804A495BFEB51F2A6F5AE89F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. The judge denied a motion for dismissal; the case itself to determine signature matching has yet to start. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023-9-1-under-advisement-ruling-and-order-.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699654203759603975
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7B54E082856202DBF8CED4E7CA07BDD7CB5668F804A495BFEB51F2A6F5AE89F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1694072229476
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16996542037596039757B54E082856202DBF8CED4E7CA07BDD7CB5668F804A495BFEB51F2A6F5AE89F9