Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-07 02:39:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 82F2DC15673C3DAEB3EB9EE9CBE3CEDC4E6628D4A3C478DB5179232C235DC732
Participant Details

Original Note:

A note states that the JUDGE "agreed" on the "terrorism" aspect,(somewhat), judge Kelly was relating it to the "enhancement technically applies", but he also acknowledged that "none of them engaged in typical acts of terrorism" (See previous NOTE w/LINK - last 2 pages of article)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699612625468793204
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 82F2DC15673C3DAEB3EB9EE9CBE3CEDC4E6628D4A3C478DB5179232C235DC732
  • createdAtMillis - 1694054385317
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169961262546879320482F2DC15673C3DAEB3EB9EE9CBE3CEDC4E6628D4A3C478DB5179232C235DC732