Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-07 15:24:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D73E5AF2353A9424F92D568EAE8A2893E2166F09043A06972F53D462DBC31D37
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contexto adicional é necessário pois o conteúdo do tweet é desinformativo. O juíz do STF que tomou tal decisão, tem ligações com a empresa beneficiada. O STF já censurou uma reportagem de ser exibida para impedir que os brasileiros saibam desse esquema. Link para o Intercept: https://www.intercept.com.br/2019/04/15/toffoli-crusoe-reportagem-stf-censura/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699535403810791590
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D73E5AF2353A9424F92D568EAE8A2893E2166F09043A06972F53D462DBC31D37
  • createdAtMillis - 1694100258439
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1699535403810791590D73E5AF2353A9424F92D568EAE8A2893E2166F09043A06972F53D462DBC31D37