Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-07 09:50:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44F77419A6B80D7025801B15DED45A81DABE6E0B9E158699290B8C064557A5E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Como se puede apreciar en el vídeo, Carvajal aboga por la preservación de la presunción de inocencia. Es lo correcto. No se pone en duda a la otra parte, simplemente añade una reflexión: que será un juez el que deba juzgar, y que no valen los juicio mediáticos. https://youtu.be/L6KNYxAJDOY?si=1coKDrmV2l3sAX1b

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699522049562001856
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 44F77419A6B80D7025801B15DED45A81DABE6E0B9E158699290B8C064557A5E8
  • createdAtMillis - 1694080214687
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169952204956200185644F77419A6B80D7025801B15DED45A81DABE6E0B9E158699290B8C064557A5E8