Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-06 20:15:04 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98C8F7837CCD4DE75B78262F5AD905D875970C804D70E3B1D86CB11CA6B37BF5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The writer of the proposed note did not read the tweet they posted their note on. This post describes new charges. In addition, even if the note was not completely incorrect, no note is needed on this obvious opinion tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699440680521642435
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98C8F7837CCD4DE75B78262F5AD905D875970C804D70E3B1D86CB11CA6B37BF5
  • createdAtMillis - 1694031304196
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169944068052164243598C8F7837CCD4DE75B78262F5AD905D875970C804D70E3B1D86CB11CA6B37BF5