Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-07 13:57:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7944E11C331A7E1859FD9665DBBB9DCB825A3D6F952EB3E3AED9363EB9C64D94
Participant Details

Original Note:

The writer of the proposed note did not read the tweet they posted their note on. This post describes new charges. In addition, even if the note was not completely incorrect, no note is needed on this obvious opinion tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699440680521642435
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7944E11C331A7E1859FD9665DBBB9DCB825A3D6F952EB3E3AED9363EB9C64D94
  • createdAtMillis - 1694095037816
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16994406805216424357944E11C331A7E1859FD9665DBBB9DCB825A3D6F952EB3E3AED9363EB9C64D94