Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-06 18:29:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 422E401FC665E95E26999477B8B7E20AAB6A6F5BA717FEEDCA8498D63BDD18D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The writer of the proposed note did not read the tweet they posted their note on. This post describes new charges. In addition, even if the note was not completely incorrect, no note is needed on this obvious opinion tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699440680521642435
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 422E401FC665E95E26999477B8B7E20AAB6A6F5BA717FEEDCA8498D63BDD18D5
  • createdAtMillis - 1694024979062
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1699440680521642435422E401FC665E95E26999477B8B7E20AAB6A6F5BA717FEEDCA8498D63BDD18D5