Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-06 15:26:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29E5C4592A96AB69101D045BC8588B2D5C33C7F9F74F69582F81E8A002EF3E3A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The writer of the proposed note did not read the tweet they posted their note on. This post describes new charges. In addition, even if the note was not completely incorrect, no note is needed on this obvious opinion tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699440680521642435
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29E5C4592A96AB69101D045BC8588B2D5C33C7F9F74F69582F81E8A002EF3E3A
  • createdAtMillis - 1694013972438
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169944068052164243529E5C4592A96AB69101D045BC8588B2D5C33C7F9F74F69582F81E8A002EF3E3A