Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-07 07:15:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44F77419A6B80D7025801B15DED45A81DABE6E0B9E158699290B8C064557A5E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

El artículo 408 del Código Penal ha sido interpretado por el Tribunal Supremo en el sentido de identificar de forma tasada a los funcionarios que lo pueden cometer (policía, fiscales, inspectores de Hacienda…) no siendo un ministro de Trabajo uno de los posibles autores. https://vlex.es/vid/hacienda-falsedad-documento-estafa-120-000-18036060

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699390444323344856
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 44F77419A6B80D7025801B15DED45A81DABE6E0B9E158699290B8C064557A5E8
  • createdAtMillis - 1694070917736
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169939044432334485644F77419A6B80D7025801B15DED45A81DABE6E0B9E158699290B8C064557A5E8