Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-06 15:45:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DAF84EE4EDFF8FBEEEE33BA7223BE175426C937402C233A1D2F40741A944AA49
Participant Details

Original Note:

Unreliable or not, this tweet is not misleading and the note is not needed. In fact, this user has been using this source since before the tweet payouts were announced, and is simply using a source that they have used in the past. Source: https://x.com/chels_hq/status/1503686423609815043?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1699387712581583344
participantId -
raterParticipantId - DAF84EE4EDFF8FBEEEE33BA7223BE175426C937402C233A1D2F40741A944AA49
createdAtMillis - 1694015110836
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1699387712581583344DAF84EE4EDFF8FBEEEE33BA7223BE175426C937402C233A1D2F40741A944AA49