Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-06 18:33:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB42A2A2A5702A0A35A99FE73B560F3A06AA7E1AAA922B37BCB8D9B9AA412D76
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community notes can't be the space to take up criticism of a scientific paper. Partisans may have very strong views about the findings of a paper but they should take those up in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699261110862725421
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB42A2A2A5702A0A35A99FE73B560F3A06AA7E1AAA922B37BCB8D9B9AA412D76
  • createdAtMillis - 1694025202816
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1699261110862725421EB42A2A2A5702A0A35A99FE73B560F3A06AA7E1AAA922B37BCB8D9B9AA412D76