Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-05 12:45:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0F827AB7329A7251D66ED293C5081B0BAB07D1F8010629487EF1FF6C92EE078
Participant Details

Original Note:

反論ノートに補足します 最初のノートには、裁判では殺人認定されなかったことが、虐殺の否定の証拠とされていますが 自警団という半ば公的な組織が起こした事や、当時の差別感情から加害者に同情的な判決が出ることは多かったです 当時の裁判の結果は時代的背景含めてみる必要があります https://www.jichiro.gr.jp/jichiken_kako/report/rep_aichi33/10/1003_jre/index.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699036762914619743
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0F827AB7329A7251D66ED293C5081B0BAB07D1F8010629487EF1FF6C92EE078
  • createdAtMillis - 1693917914842
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1699036762914619743E0F827AB7329A7251D66ED293C5081B0BAB07D1F8010629487EF1FF6C92EE078