Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-05 14:55:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7EBE89BD404901D62D503F4EC12633BF29125F5FAFBB14170851D8E3AE04129
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il s’agit clairement d’une plaisanterie, il suffit de regarder les noms. On peut ajouter un contexte pour le grand public mais parler de faux, c’est HS. L’accuser de complotisme par rapport au grand remplacement = opinion ou spéculation. Et wiki n’est pas une source sérieuse.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698960934926966943
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7EBE89BD404901D62D503F4EC12633BF29125F5FAFBB14170851D8E3AE04129
  • createdAtMillis - 1693925758625
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1698960934926966943E7EBE89BD404901D62D503F4EC12633BF29125F5FAFBB14170851D8E3AE04129