Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-03 21:01:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 50C2EF0CACB3627D4DE66340CDBB4B79C80D5EAD1CDE9697518472F3078012CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il s’agit clairement d’une plaisanterie, il suffit de regarder les noms. On peut ajouter un contexte pour le grand public mais parler de faux, c’est HS. L’accuser de complotisme par rapport au grand remplacement = opinion ou spéculation. Et wiki n’est pas une source sérieuse.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698960934926966943
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 50C2EF0CACB3627D4DE66340CDBB4B79C80D5EAD1CDE9697518472F3078012CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1725397294547
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169896093492696694350C2EF0CACB3627D4DE66340CDBB4B79C80D5EAD1CDE9697518472F3078012CC