Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-05 21:55:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 06C2CA76C7A808E8FD4DC7A21E2C21DA519EDB01B7FD086A81C7B47404B32E4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

La nota propuesta es especulativa y pierde el punto hablando del salario de Echenique. Por favor, datos, fuentes y objetividad en las notas

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698774388156318015
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 06C2CA76C7A808E8FD4DC7A21E2C21DA519EDB01B7FD086A81C7B47404B32E4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1693950910048
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169877438815631801506C2CA76C7A808E8FD4DC7A21E2C21DA519EDB01B7FD086A81C7B47404B32E4D