Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-04 08:17:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C57E4BDEDB22B0BCFA649AFA9A4983DA9BB11B2F9859E3A59602FA3D38AEE69D
Participant Details

Original Note:

To the note on this tweet, I appreciate the effort to combat misinformation on this platform. However, this is clearly implied to be a joke. Even with its misleading nature, it would not matter in terms of its effect. Additionally, since its from 2015, it is approx. correct. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distracted_boyfriend

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698600999072710874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C57E4BDEDB22B0BCFA649AFA9A4983DA9BB11B2F9859E3A59602FA3D38AEE69D
  • createdAtMillis - 1693815441377
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1698600999072710874C57E4BDEDB22B0BCFA649AFA9A4983DA9BB11B2F9859E3A59602FA3D38AEE69D