Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-03 17:43:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8280F86BEFB1B8937E9DD0CE512444324736E01AE8B2AD6100651AB6424FC8CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

'Lie detector tests' or 'Polygraphs' are not entirely supported by the scientific community to account for results of dishonesty. In fact, European courts and the APA don't accept readings of a Polygraph as accurate or factual. https://www.apa.org/topics/cognitive-neuroscience/polygraph https://books.google.ie/books?id=4VJBDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT62&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698348905836998689
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8280F86BEFB1B8937E9DD0CE512444324736E01AE8B2AD6100651AB6424FC8CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1693763027682
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16983489058369986898280F86BEFB1B8937E9DD0CE512444324736E01AE8B2AD6100651AB6424FC8CA