Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-03 14:59:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48830813075019289E2D1E822CD69B03C11675039D7D98F255BD76FD09DA470E
Participant Details

Original Note:

'Lie detector tests' or 'Polygraphs' are not entirely supported by the scientific community to account for results of dishonesty. In fact, European courts and the APA don't accept readings of a Polygraph as accurate or factual. https://www.apa.org/topics/cognitive-neuroscience/polygraph https://books.google.ie/books?id=4VJBDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT62&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698348905836998689
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48830813075019289E2D1E822CD69B03C11675039D7D98F255BD76FD09DA470E
  • createdAtMillis - 1693753167506
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 169834890583699868948830813075019289E2D1E822CD69B03C11675039D7D98F255BD76FD09DA470E