Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-05 07:20:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D278D19A9D83E72C45AD976565F5F781B26CE3CC45773025C88AB07DBF5FA80B
Participant Details

Original Note:

La note affichée est fausse puisque 0% de l'eau pompée n'est restituée aux nappes phréatiques d'origine... Elle repart dans le système hydrologique (eaux de surface) ou à l'atmosphère 🤷 Et la SFEN, lobby du nucléaire, comme source fiable ??? lol

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698325228164624626
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D278D19A9D83E72C45AD976565F5F781B26CE3CC45773025C88AB07DBF5FA80B
  • createdAtMillis - 1693898408725
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1698325228164624626D278D19A9D83E72C45AD976565F5F781B26CE3CC45773025C88AB07DBF5FA80B