Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 00:39:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7F97098A3704D1DC6C6AE79185D707030AF1BF387F8EC86348B803BA39C9865
Participant Details

Original Note:

The appellate judgement: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9424279/apter-v-dept-of-health-human-svc/ Does not tell FDA to "stop practicing medicine." The decision merely allows doctors to file their suit despite Sovreign immunity. The doctor's APA claim remains denied and no wrongdoing by FDA has been determined.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698305956709339569
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7F97098A3704D1DC6C6AE79185D707030AF1BF387F8EC86348B803BA39C9865
  • createdAtMillis - 1705279154082
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1698305956709339569E7F97098A3704D1DC6C6AE79185D707030AF1BF387F8EC86348B803BA39C9865