Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 03:14:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E8E4058B6950A3DE03740A24A613B3BF60AB7DFDFBD2C7A3E1B7AFC67CFE892
Participant Details

Original Note:

The appellate judgement: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9424279/apter-v-dept-of-health-human-svc/ Does not tell FDA to "stop practicing medicine." The decision merely allows doctors to file their suit despite Sovreign immunity. The doctor's APA claim remains denied and no wrongdoing by FDA has been determined.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698305956709339569
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E8E4058B6950A3DE03740A24A613B3BF60AB7DFDFBD2C7A3E1B7AFC67CFE892
  • createdAtMillis - 1705288489550
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16983059567093395699E8E4058B6950A3DE03740A24A613B3BF60AB7DFDFBD2C7A3E1B7AFC67CFE892