Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 20:05:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2FD67EABA361C6AF14AF316571E75C1D1BD874A823AB9B92894A7B74A94852A7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The appellate judgement: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9424279/apter-v-dept-of-health-human-svc/ Does not tell FDA to "stop practicing medicine." The decision merely allows doctors to file their suit despite Sovreign immunity. The doctor's APA claim remains denied and no wrongdoing by FDA has been determined.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698305956709339569
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2FD67EABA361C6AF14AF316571E75C1D1BD874A823AB9B92894A7B74A94852A7
  • createdAtMillis - 1705262747671
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16983059567093395692FD67EABA361C6AF14AF316571E75C1D1BD874A823AB9B92894A7B74A94852A7