Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 01:56:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1A0696E541A0A6BE7C3E485BB209129A43CE53D7C53BDF2D8492D66BC211C1EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The appellate judgement: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9424279/apter-v-dept-of-health-human-svc/ Does not tell FDA to "stop practicing medicine." The decision merely allows doctors to file their suit despite Sovreign immunity. The doctor's APA claim remains denied and no wrongdoing by FDA has been determined.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698305956709339569
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1A0696E541A0A6BE7C3E485BB209129A43CE53D7C53BDF2D8492D66BC211C1EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1705283797458
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16983059567093395691A0696E541A0A6BE7C3E485BB209129A43CE53D7C53BDF2D8492D66BC211C1EE