Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-03 00:00:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6DDCD1EC793C5198DD1C5EFBDF8E0136FA4A66D75ABB54F94D1468F02A9EB25E
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is anecdotal evidence, meaning it is heavily unreliable because the tweet is only a personal testimony. As a result, no logical explanation can be deduced from this. Read more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence?wprov=sfti1 https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41235-021-00293-2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698020115344937369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6DDCD1EC793C5198DD1C5EFBDF8E0136FA4A66D75ABB54F94D1468F02A9EB25E
  • createdAtMillis - 1693699230933
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16980201153449373696DDCD1EC793C5198DD1C5EFBDF8E0136FA4A66D75ABB54F94D1468F02A9EB25E