Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-02 22:16:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2AE966E44CC5066665C77AC7384C1C9F0D136C528BD7FBFDA1AA5996322945BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is anecdotal evidence, meaning it is heavily unreliable because the tweet is only a personal testimony. As a result, no logical explanation can be deduced from this. Read more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence?wprov=sfti1 https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41235-021-00293-2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698020115344937369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2AE966E44CC5066665C77AC7384C1C9F0D136C528BD7FBFDA1AA5996322945BD
  • createdAtMillis - 1693693016584
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16980201153449373692AE966E44CC5066665C77AC7384C1C9F0D136C528BD7FBFDA1AA5996322945BD