Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-01 10:07:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 51A208310029F328098C5CFC8FF40D77CC42FEB8305EA5554D5060A92AF3075A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Persönliche Meinungen wonach der optische Eindruck zu relativieren sei, gehören in die Kommentare. Logisch ist, dass ein Solarpark in Bezug auf Art, Höhe u. Fläche von Bewuchs nie mit naturüberlassener Fläche äquivalent sein kann. Bewertung d. Meinungsfreiheit gedeckt.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697545660352884965
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 51A208310029F328098C5CFC8FF40D77CC42FEB8305EA5554D5060A92AF3075A
  • createdAtMillis - 1693562845234
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169754566035288496551A208310029F328098C5CFC8FF40D77CC42FEB8305EA5554D5060A92AF3075A