Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-01 12:55:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1A03F5FD0542EBB9A39ED9349921B50FD1F9430C7FDAF802A8D523AC600226C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Persönliche Meinungen wonach der optische Eindruck zu relativieren sei, gehören in die Kommentare. Logisch ist, dass ein Solarpark in Bezug auf Art, Höhe u. Fläche von Bewuchs nie mit naturüberlassener Fläche äquivalent sein kann. Bewertung d. Meinungsfreiheit gedeckt.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697545660352884965
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1A03F5FD0542EBB9A39ED9349921B50FD1F9430C7FDAF802A8D523AC600226C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1693572954211
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16975456603528849651A03F5FD0542EBB9A39ED9349921B50FD1F9430C7FDAF802A8D523AC600226C1