Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-02 05:59:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D59103CD6639B0BBF78202A840CE6632C8A039C42668AEE6C65FF7F17A2FFD9F
Participant Details

Original Note:

日本語において、処理水と汚染水は明確に区別して用いられています。原子力建屋内で燃料デブリに触れて放射性物質を含んだのが「汚染水」で、そこからALPS(多核種除去設備)などを用いてトリチウム以外の放射性物質を規制基準以下まで取り除いたものが「ALPS処理水」です。 https://fukushima-updates.reconstruction.go.jp/faq/fk_240.html そのため、ALPS処理後の水を「汚染水」と呼ぶことはミスリードになる恐れがあります。 また、英語でもContaminated water(汚染水)、Treated water(処理水)と区別され、IAEAもALPS treated waterと表現しています(IAEA)。 https://www.tepco.co.jp/en/hd/decommission/towards_decommissioning/Things_you_should_know_more_about_decommissioning/answer-07-e.html https://www.iaea.org/topics/response/fukushima-daiichi-nuclear-accident/fukushima-daiichi-alps-treated-water-discharge

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697520061110739153
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D59103CD6639B0BBF78202A840CE6632C8A039C42668AEE6C65FF7F17A2FFD9F
  • createdAtMillis - 1693634356314
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1697520061110739153D59103CD6639B0BBF78202A840CE6632C8A039C42668AEE6C65FF7F17A2FFD9F