Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-01 10:10:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1D022F57871A27CFFC835E852A6A5E38D2EF5F36C59CD4706BDA2AE5B9EA060
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. L'article ne dit pas que les réponses d'Antoine comportaient des incohérences, mais au contraire que celui-ci avait « déposé un recours en raison de plusieurs incohérences au cours son entretien. »

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697424459928314251
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1D022F57871A27CFFC835E852A6A5E38D2EF5F36C59CD4706BDA2AE5B9EA060
  • createdAtMillis - 1693563019164
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1697424459928314251C1D022F57871A27CFFC835E852A6A5E38D2EF5F36C59CD4706BDA2AE5B9EA060