Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-01 16:56:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 225B21FEC0A48C93F765684561FEC701D27279F3794F201AA70DB17200C4AAFD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is deceptive & misleading Many well known reviewers gave 90+ ratings such as: IGN Spain, Game Rant, The Washington Post, GAMINGbible, IGN Brazil, dualSHOCKERS, Screen Rant, VGC, IGN Japan, Destructoid, GamesRadar+, Gaming Nexus, Forbes, IGN France, Wccftech, ShackNews https://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/starfield/critic-reviews https://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-series-x/starfield/critic-reviews

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1697412642774610274
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 225B21FEC0A48C93F765684561FEC701D27279F3794F201AA70DB17200C4AAFD
createdAtMillis - 1693587419617
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1697412642774610274225B21FEC0A48C93F765684561FEC701D27279F3794F201AA70DB17200C4AAFD