Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-01 06:12:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 62A2DD3D0E7D6AF929A5A7D6F92E7DA2CE60FD5D7F8D22F5BB2275BEF8E7831E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The "fact checking" sources cited in the first Note are not reliable in themselves. The two cited "fact checks" include only opinions of others. Other opinions are insufficient to conclude the tweet's own opinion is factually 'false.'

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697160924690358544
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 62A2DD3D0E7D6AF929A5A7D6F92E7DA2CE60FD5D7F8D22F5BB2275BEF8E7831E
  • createdAtMillis - 1709273561574
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169716092469035854462A2DD3D0E7D6AF929A5A7D6F92E7DA2CE60FD5D7F8D22F5BB2275BEF8E7831E