Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-31 09:18:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48614F80D962A2CDD9DFFFF2DBA51DB1129F3BF1E4DA1BA06B5AA994D85CB68B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The "fact checking" sources cited in the first Note are not reliable in themselves. The two cited "fact checks" include only opinions of others. Other opinions are insufficient to conclude the tweet's own opinion is factually 'false.'

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697160924690358544
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48614F80D962A2CDD9DFFFF2DBA51DB1129F3BF1E4DA1BA06B5AA994D85CB68B
  • createdAtMillis - 1693473530277
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169716092469035854448614F80D962A2CDD9DFFFF2DBA51DB1129F3BF1E4DA1BA06B5AA994D85CB68B