Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-31 11:54:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6E9349E04B33F08DB783F8CECBE6D708426CFAF5DD58F34FAD1DC1506EFED32
Participant Details

Original Note:

There are multiple independent studies that support this. None were funded by WEF: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-25189-001 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15576620/ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00574.x

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697149403839057959
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F6E9349E04B33F08DB783F8CECBE6D708426CFAF5DD58F34FAD1DC1506EFED32
  • createdAtMillis - 1693482875472
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1697149403839057959F6E9349E04B33F08DB783F8CECBE6D708426CFAF5DD58F34FAD1DC1506EFED32