Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-31 07:52:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DAE97767DFA06C713D2AA5DD8A8BE12146938486D96ADCD5DDE107A9ED1A9B29
Participant Details

Original Note:

There are multiple independent studies that support this. None were funded by WEF: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-25189-001 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15576620/ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00574.x

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697149403839057959
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DAE97767DFA06C713D2AA5DD8A8BE12146938486D96ADCD5DDE107A9ED1A9B29
  • createdAtMillis - 1693468321916
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1697149403839057959DAE97767DFA06C713D2AA5DD8A8BE12146938486D96ADCD5DDE107A9ED1A9B29