Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-31 00:50:48 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A019F51F84CF2F0FAFCCAD89EB87A8B5D3F15B3F7A2E92BB23C01556993AE78B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The suggested note that this isn't weakening protection isn't backed up by the link "gives pretty much zero leeway. Anything that adds to environmental impacts, even fractionally, is out." So it is weakening protection. The degree to which this is acceptable is a matter opinion

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696926698208477420
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A019F51F84CF2F0FAFCCAD89EB87A8B5D3F15B3F7A2E92BB23C01556993AE78B
  • createdAtMillis - 1693443048188
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1696926698208477420A019F51F84CF2F0FAFCCAD89EB87A8B5D3F15B3F7A2E92BB23C01556993AE78B