Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-04 11:46:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F124ED8191629B2906C8E82E4A995F4A6FF31D7D6E01B814C29211DCEDCD7F34
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not misleading. Data is captured correctly and shown clearly. Regardless, one key stated reason for ULEZ is to support Asthmatics, where carcinogen status of particles is irrelevant (PM2.5 is, however).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696830347592208571
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F124ED8191629B2906C8E82E4A995F4A6FF31D7D6E01B814C29211DCEDCD7F34
  • createdAtMillis - 1696419964198
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1696830347592208571F124ED8191629B2906C8E82E4A995F4A6FF31D7D6E01B814C29211DCEDCD7F34