Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-30 12:06:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52F41180D9D61743F162C5EF58B389C080D79AF74FEFD92FA7B7A6420C53619C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not misleading. Data is captured correctly and shown clearly. Regardless, one key stated reason for ULEZ is to support Asthmatics, where carcinogen status of particles is irrelevant (PM2.5 is, however).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696830347592208571
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 52F41180D9D61743F162C5EF58B389C080D79AF74FEFD92FA7B7A6420C53619C
  • createdAtMillis - 1693397165709
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169683034759220857152F41180D9D61743F162C5EF58B389C080D79AF74FEFD92FA7B7A6420C53619C