Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-30 12:19:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 146D83BA55B0D9C54BF8760BDCE98802C7D5B51B9EC0E33287B2A9E14D7067B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not misleading. Data is captured correctly and shown clearly. Regardless, one key stated reason for ULEZ is to support Asthmatics, where carcinogen status of particles is irrelevant (PM2.5 is, however).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696830347592208571
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 146D83BA55B0D9C54BF8760BDCE98802C7D5B51B9EC0E33287B2A9E14D7067B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1693397989987
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1696830347592208571146D83BA55B0D9C54BF8760BDCE98802C7D5B51B9EC0E33287B2A9E14D7067B0