Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-30 02:47:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CC1542F0F89166A826EAA50759CADC368B4C5BEFEF5194B1099CF9D216D168B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The McCullough preprint was removed/retracted because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. No Inclusion/exclusion criteria was provided for the study. No control group. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696596146687238380
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CC1542F0F89166A826EAA50759CADC368B4C5BEFEF5194B1099CF9D216D168B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1693363622925
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1696596146687238380CC1542F0F89166A826EAA50759CADC368B4C5BEFEF5194B1099CF9D216D168B9