Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-30 11:12:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 91980D864B540F957919A860AC646D2ED72A5B226A2C61EB8B29ABECB6D88621
Participant Details

Original Note:

The McCullough preprint was removed/retracted because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. No Inclusion/exclusion criteria was provided for the study. No control group. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696596146687238380
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 91980D864B540F957919A860AC646D2ED72A5B226A2C61EB8B29ABECB6D88621
  • createdAtMillis - 1693393950080
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169659614668723838091980D864B540F957919A860AC646D2ED72A5B226A2C61EB8B29ABECB6D88621