Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-29 10:57:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DEFC614510FA3B039294C213DB73F9699D9562FF86158BD8CA23BE4744D2A440
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce tweet confond une communauté et le peuple. S'il est trop tôt pour avoir une sociologie des utilisateurs des notes, les travaux sur les contributeurs de Wikipédia sont clairs: ce sont "plutôt des hommes, soit diplômés du supérieur, soit ayant moins de 20 ans". https://journals.openedition.org/terminal/7488

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1696421436779327949
participantId -
raterParticipantId - DEFC614510FA3B039294C213DB73F9699D9562FF86158BD8CA23BE4744D2A440
createdAtMillis - 1693306677899
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1696421436779327949DEFC614510FA3B039294C213DB73F9699D9562FF86158BD8CA23BE4744D2A440