Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-29 10:08:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F66CB5313EF4966579B09C7E27B2C239AB0508ABC2D35A239F4470FE80E9E165
Participant Details

Original Note:

La spécialiste interrogée dans le documentaire, présente dans l'extrait vidéo, affirme que cette hypothèse n'est pas crédible.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696275182220911044
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F66CB5313EF4966579B09C7E27B2C239AB0508ABC2D35A239F4470FE80E9E165
  • createdAtMillis - 1693303720290
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1696275182220911044F66CB5313EF4966579B09C7E27B2C239AB0508ABC2D35A239F4470FE80E9E165